Non-duality

 

Self needs to believe because it is unsure of itself while SELF knows because it ‘IS’ SELF. ~Dean A. Banks, D.D.

Thanx to Ra Divakar for inspiring this post!

 

Ivan Frimmel: Yes, Dean. And the surety that the illusory, seemingly separated self requires is the clear realization that there is no duality, no separation, nor any difference between "self" & SELF - that self is SELF, one is One... Tat Tw...am Asi = you are That. I prefer to say THIS, rather than THAT, because "That" implies It / Divine Self is elsewhere, not Eternally Here & Now, as ALL THIS, as Universal I, or God Self as you say in your comments above and below, Dean. Namaste

 

Ra Divakar Thanks for mentioning me Dean A. Banks! I think that is where we agreed that "ego" and "self" together is redundant?

Ron Alexander Yes, and the "ego" is such a controversial term, so just using "self" is easier to understand, however I agree with Ivan Frimmel "Yes, Dean Dean A. Banks And the surety that the illusory, seemingly separated self requires is the clear realization that there is no duality, no separation, nor any difference between "self" & SELF - that self is SELF, one is One... Tat Twam Asi = you are That."